Soccer Coaching - Football Lessons from the World Cup Attack

Here are 4 lessons on attacking football, I learned from the 2010 World Cup:

a better style of football offensive mix of short passes and long balls. Germany and the Netherlands with a mixture of short passes and long balls. Spain, on the other hand, was of the commenters only, to play a short passing game and not just play long balls criticized. Yes, Spain won, but did not win because of their crime, because of theirDefense. You just 8 goals in 7 matches and scored the winning goal against the Netherlands was due to luck, when a long journey from the waist Torres bounced a Dutch defender, controlled, not because of an attack. An analogy in American football is a team that runs the only, or just by chance. We know that the opponents would attack all one-dimensional. Mix keeps the opponent off balance.

A second classic counter-attack football is beautiful and can be obtained fromGoalkeeper. On the winning goal against Algeria, the U.S. attack began with a quick-setting for launching the custodian Landon Donovan. Donovan then made a great pass. The aggressors onball right side, a second attacker ran to the pole, a third attacker ran towards the pole (both are a step or two behind the ball so you can watch the game and not offside) and Donovan designed to bring the game rebound, that's exactly what he did score. Germanyhad some good counter-team against Argentina. To me there is nothing better than a fast break team.

Third, if the reader has trouble scoring, remember, like Spain, the Netherlands beat and win the World Cup 2010. It was in the 116th minute (26 'overtime.) The score was 0-0. Spain attacked on a fast break Jesus Navas, a wing, which began a path 50-yard ball from Spaindefensive shares of about 10 meters behind the center line. The ball was away from Navas from the Dutch, but the loose ball to Iniesta, who was a heel of Fabregas, who Navas, who is going to happen then passed to Torres kicks made. (This led Spain with four players on the field to score, which were defended by six Dutch players.) Torres sent a hard, flat disk around the waist to Iniesta, but a Dutch player stepped forward to lock (Torres's pace was really a bad pass that wouldIniesta were behind and may have been outside the limits). The Dutch player was unable to control the ball, because the gap was so hard and having a life. The ball bounced passed to Fabregas, Iniesta is. It should be noted that during the game, although he lost the ball, Jesus Navas attack and was kept open for the passage of Fabregas, and after passing the ball Navas Navas overlapping Fabregas and ran to the top of the penalty box score its range - the movement without the ballhas a new opportunity for the destination. The lesson is that if you have trouble scoring, scorers get in scoring range, the ball on them too hard, and hope for a lucky break. To play all possessions Spain (which runs hundreds of short passes, long passes, very few, very few long-dribbling and controlled the ball for 64% of the game), they created won the game on a fluke with a 50 -yard dribbling run a hard line drive to go wrong, and why marker canScore. Torres, of course, knew it would not work as it did, but his pace was really difficult because his passport was resolved on the ground and go through a typical soft modeling would probably have been resolved. The ball takes a high waist that created the possibility, in combination with markers in a position to exploit opportunities. The whole counter-attack only lasted 25 seconds. This is another example of why mixed game is good. All the short-passing game is not as effective asA mixture of short passes and long passes and dribbling some long runs. The same analogy applies to most of the sport - in case of attack with the same style all the time (as all the long passes or short passes throughout the game), there will be predictable and easy to use to defend. On the winning goal the Netherlands have a good job on defense. The goal was two strokes of luck in Spain and bustle and movement without the ball, it was not because of poor defense.

Fourth offensive support and movement off the ball are necessaryto maintain possession. In the final phase of the World Cup, Spain has a much better job than in the Netherlands support the attackers. Would always be 3 or 4 player supports the attacker before (onball the attacker) in what appeared to be at a distance of 20 meters. In comparison, the Dutch players seemed to be about 40 meters from the first attacker (perhaps trying to create a lot of width in their attack) are. The result was that the Dutch striker had previously oftenLooking for someone who (slow play) to go and if the pace was often stolen by Spain because the revelation was a long distance. In the game, Spain had 64% of the time.

See Also : Best Shoes concertsticketscheap