World Cup 2010 - Analysis of the group stage

World Cup 2010 in South Africa ended the group stage. Beginning to hurt things this Saturday, as it is time for the "knock-out stages, but before making a compromise and analyze the facts, surprises, curiosity and disappointments of the first two weeks.

South American teams have confirmed their good form, with Uruguay, Mexico, Paraguay, Chile, Brazil and Argentina, Chile qualification, which means that all the participating teams in the SouthAmerican World beyond the group stage, something that is unprecedented.

Europe is not, as many teams as usual for the second qualifying round for France and Italy (negative surprises), Greece, Slovenia, Serbia, Denmark and Switzerland could not provide. African teams have not been able to go, having preferred to fight the "sharks" in their groups, in addition to Ghana, the only African team in the second round of 16 games.

Côte d'Ivoire, as the best African team toA moment of disappointment, despite the fact that they are part of the "Group of Death" known. Asia is still good with South Korea and Japan it represents. Several teams of Rookie countries with low or lost on the road, while some of the usual candidates, like England, Germany, Holland and Spain qualified with difficulty or not.

The biggest fiasco was no doubt as France and Italy, the two finalists of the 2006 World Cup, thehome earlier than many stages has been presented, had the last one has never happened before in. Both teams managed to finish in last place in their groups, none of them to win a match. In addition to negative, the French footballer in "cases" were that their country and their fans involved in a state of shock.

On the other hand, we have big surprises, starting with Slovakia, the world champions Italy, Japan, pack the bags lined Denmark sent. The Danes hadwon the qualifying round for the World Cup in Portugal, who were fighting for second place. The U.S. team deserved the title of best fighters who never give up, even after being robbed by two clean goals in two different games and deserved to go through.

Finally, statistics, Portugal and Uruguay were the only teams that did not want to admit any goals, while Algeria and Honduras, where all guests. North Korea and Cameroon has zero points, with North Koreawith the worst defense granted twelve gates. Argentina and Portugal have the best attack with seven goals.

Argentina and Holland, can boast as the only teams to have won all three games. Also noteworthy was the fact that six African teams went to the (Ivory Coast, Nigeria, Algeria, South Africa, Cameroon and Ghana), only the latter in the last 16.

Of the sixteen teams still in the race, the American continent is represented by seven teams: Uruguay,Mexico, Argentina, USA, Paraguay, Brazil and Chile Europe has six teams: England, Germany, Netherlands, Portugal, Slovakia and Spain. Asia has two representatives: Japan and South Korea, while Ghana is the sole representative of the African continent.

Breakdown of the last 16 games

Uruguay vs South Korea - June 26, 2010 Watch 03:00 (GMT)
Ghana vs USA - June 26 2010 19.30 clock (GMT)
Germany vs England - June 27, 2010 03:00 clock(GMT)
Argentina vs. Mexico - June 27, 2010 Watch 07:30 (GMT)
Netherlands vs Slovakia - June 28 2010 15.00 clock (GMT)
Chile v Brazil - June 28, 2010 07:30 clock (GMT)
Paraguay vs. Japan - June 29 2010 15.00 clock (GMT)
Spain vs Portugal - June 29, 2010 07:30 clock (GMT)

Friends Link : Best Shoes guidebikramyogatraining

Continuar leyendo

Ocultar articulo

The shock of the failure of England World Cup Team in 2010 - A sport psychology Analysis (Part 1)

Even before the last game against Slovenia, the British team had had a severe disorder of time with the team. John Terry has told reporters that nine players taken in Cape Town to discuss the shortcomings of the team and said he represents the players and the team said it was time for truth that could upset the manager of air. Similar to the crisis in France under a team in England had broken team. The rules are the rules of conduct that members of the team are expected. Standarddifferent rules, the rules are for all formal and usually there is some penalty for breaking the rules. In many sports teams, there is a standard (or unwritten), what is said in the locker room stays in the locker room. Speaking with the manager before the media, Terry shocked the rest of the players and undermining the skipper.

This brings us to the second point of the leadership style of Capello. There are two types of leadership that is democratic vs.autocratic. Democratic leadership seeks consensus before any decision. In contrast, the autocratic style of leadership requires players in the direction of the trainer to follow without question. In the case of hair, and a second group. Everyone has his own management style has advantages and disadvantages, and in this case, the autocratic style helped to succeed Capello at a certain level. After a team of all-stars-highest-paid, it is difficult for the coach to the players to sacrifice on the moveego, in the interest of the team. Capello and his autocratic style has made the stars train and grow as a team to a crucial part in the selection of players based on ability, not their former glory.

If the leadership is so good, so what's the problem? One of the disadvantages of autocratic leadership is that it does not leave much room for players to express their views and concerns about the problems. Look at the way she has handled the issue with Terry disorders. Insteadopen communication, so that players and express their feelings, gave a haircut on the whole thing rebellion exhaustion, only possible from a DVD of the game Algeria. Then no one could gather the players in England a word. It could be a healthy situation when an international manager ruled with an iron fist in a World Cup, as well as aides Capello himself was not attractive to the players. Although Terry's outburst was risky,immature and suspended him, his manager has confirmed its authority throughout the process isolates the dissenters, and changed the focus firmly back to him.

In modern sports psychology, open communication is essential. With players to express themselves and resolve, if they are small, the team will have a better chance to solve problems and move forward cohesively. If Capello as typical as an autocratic leader, as always one-sided in its decisions, the readerwere afraid to speak. "I talked to some players and I think it's only John Terry, who says this," said Capello. "No one spoke openly about these comments My door is always with me, if I speak Whenever I talk to a session, I asked my captain to have :"... Issues that you want to say something? ? "Added Capello. If you have a clear rule and air as players must be regarded as positive feedback that it is, could his autocratic authority, the people are afraid to voice-Upproblems. For English team, this could be the cause of a critical disruption.

(Continued on page 2)

See Also : Best Shoes gamespopcap

Continuar leyendo

Ocultar articulo

The shock of failure of the British team at World Cup 2010 - Sport Psychology analysis (Part 1)

Even before the last game against Slovenia, the England team had problems through a difficult time with the team. John Terry has told reporters that nine players taken in Cape Town to check the site and the gaps, said that represents the players and the team said it was the moment of truth that might upset the air handler. broken like the crisis of the group in France, a national standard in English. The rules are the rules of conduct that members of the team are expected. Standarddifferent set of rules in the rules are for all formal and usually there is some penalty for breaking the rules. In many sports teams, there is a rule (or an unwritten rule) that is said in the locker room, stays in the locker room. irritated with the speak with the media, Terry the rest of the players and undermining the skipper.

This brings us to number two on the management style of point Capello. There are two types of leadership, namely, democratic vs.autocratic. Democratic leadership is seeking the consent of all, before the decision is made. In contrast, the autocratic leadership style requires players to set the direction of the coach, no doubt follows. If Capello, who belongs to the second group. Each leadership style has helped its advantages and disadvantages, and in this case, the autocratic style Capello succeeded at some level. With a team of All-Stars-high-paid, hard to sacrifice for the coach to player movementego for the good of the team. Capello has done with his autocratic style has that train the stars and grow as a team by choosing players based on ability, not its former glory crucial.

If leadership is so good, then what is the problem? One of the disadvantages of autocratic leadership is that you do not leave much space for the players to express their views and concerns about things. Look how they treated the problem clashes with Terry. Instead ofopen communication and discuss the players to express their feelings, put on another Capello Kibosh all exhausted rebellion can simply playing a DVD of Algeria. Then no one could call the play in England one word. He could be a healthy situation Cup, when a manager international, world ruled with an iron fist, and even assistants Capello himself was irresistible for gamers. Although Terry's outburst is risky,immature and left him on sight, his manager has confirmed its authority throughout the process, isolates the dissenters and lit the fire with his back firmly.

In modern sports psychology, open communication is essential. When players to express themselves and to resolve questions if they are small, the team has a better chance to solve problems and move forward coherently. If Capello as typical as the autocratic leader, because he was always determined in its decision, readerwere afraid to talk. "I talked to some players and I think only John Terry, who said this," Capello said. "Nobody told me about these comments. My door is always open. If you talk to me can not talk to me. Every time I get a session, I ask my captain:" Problems? You want to have something to say? "Added Capello. If he had a clear rule and air as players, feedback can be positively evaluated, could his autocratic authority, people are afraid to expressproblems. For the English team, this could be the cause of a critical agitation.

(Continued on part 2)

Recommend : Best Shoes americanhistory

Continuar leyendo

Ocultar articulo

World Cup 2010 - Analysis and Forecasting

historical fact

Based on historical data, no team from Europe has ever raised in Europe, the World Cup. A host country of the continent finally won every World Cup except in 1958 when Brazil won in Sweden. the first World Cup on Asian soil, as eventual winner was in 2002 in Korea and Japan, which was not an Asian country, but Brazil again. Asian countries were not ready to win again, although S. Korea wasclose. These are the historical facts of World Cup in the last 100 years more. Eight years later, do you think an African country is actually ready for the floor lift the World Cup on their home? In bold are those that bet against history.

Our approach is to bet on a country in South America to lift the European Cup back outside, a country with little money tend to go before African history a.

The analysis ofTeams

Brazil was at stake and too often their chances quite low at 4.5, but still good. Po 'money should go to them.

Argentina is the dark horse. Not many people give them a chance, because it belongs to a certain Diego Armando Maradona has eccentric drawbar. They have talented players available and I have a feeling that their critics eat their words glued together despite all the unwanted attention of Diego. Reminds me a bit 'Italy at the World Cup. The Italians have a lot of problems with team spirit, someone dies and so on. But I managed to use the stick as a tool to play with the football is to win the World Cup effectively.

England, as usual is over rated. Fabio Capello is just so far. The story is not good that many talented players. Gerard, Rooney, Lampard, Terry had a good World Cup, but only up to the semifinalsagain. I have a strange feeling going back on penalties. Guess who missed the decisive penalty kick?

My Portugal is famous go around this time. Sin that are in the group of death. They are too dependent on Ronaldo. I'm afraid, Carlos Scolari is not this time. However, apart from Ronaldo, the players are all mediocre.

I like the African teams. This World Cup can not be his. In recent World Cups ishave shown the world that are talented, clever and disturbing the situation better. Remember, Roger Milla and the Indomitable Lions. Now, with more high-profile players in Europe, Especially with better coaches and technical assumptions, and on their home soil, this could be the World Cup is that new ways must be explored. The first African nation to the ground, lift the World Cup at home? It is not South Africa, are not Piennar type of player. The currentCaliber are the players with the Ivory Coast and Ghana as well. Players like Drogba, Toure, Kalou, Essien are great players with great experience. It can only make the jump to the next great African players.

As for the Asian teams, I think they had to leave. It is neither the time nor the place to start in another strong performance this time. teams to underestimate their capacity in 2002. She did not make the same mistakes again.

Spain. Sigh .... They have the lowest. Although talented,soon to be against the South Americans. Winning the European Championship is one thing. Winning the World Cup against Brazil and Argentina is different. Moreover, they are not in Europe. Good luck to them.

Germany and Italy? Their era is over. Check out their league at the moment. Hard to imagine being away with the winners from Europe.

The group winners and runners-up proposal (called the winning group, two designated runners-up)
(See http://www.fifa.com/worldcup/standings/index.html Group)

A1 - France
A2 - Uruguay
B1 - Argentina
B2 - Nigeria
C1 - England
C2 - Algeria
D1 - Germany
D2 - Ghana
E1 - Holland
E2 - Cameroon
F1 - Italy
F2 - Paraguay
G1 - Brazil
G2 Coast - Ivory
H1 - Spain
H2 - Chile

Playoffs proposal (http://www.fifa.com/worldcup/matches/kostage.html)

Second Round Quarterfinals Semifinals Schedule> Final / 3-4

France / Nigeria Ghana Nigeria
England vs Ghana Ghana

Holland / Netherlands Brazil Paraguay
Brazil V Chile

Germany Algeria Argentina against Germany
Argentina Argentina / Uruguay

Italy-Cameroon Côte d'Ivoire Italy
Spain / Côte d'Ivoire Côte d'Ivoire

My Links : Best Shoes teachertrainingyoga

Continuar leyendo

Ocultar articulo